September 24th, 2026
Lifestyle
Guide
Rent
Last reviewed 21 Sep 2026 · 24 min read
If you're searching for luxury apartments in Tokyo, you've probably already noticed the problem: every listing site calls itself "luxury," and the word stops meaning much after the tenth photo of a marble lobby. Some of what gets marketed that way is genuinely exceptional. A lot of it is a standard tower unit with a concierge desk and a higher asking price.
This guide is written for people who are actually going to sign a lease, not browse a gallery. That includes relocating executives whose company is picking up the rent, high-income professionals who want turnkey convenience and are willing to pay for it, and anyone trying to work out whether the premium over a normal Tokyo apartment buys something real.
We're not going to pretend every high-rise in Minato Ward is worth the asking price. Some of it is genuinely excellent. Some of it is a good building having a marketing team. The rest of this guide is about telling the two apart, plus what it actually costs to get in the door.
There's also a straightforward reason this segment deserves its own guide rather than a section inside a general Tokyo rental article. The rules are different at the top of the market. Screening leans harder on income and often runs through a corporate guarantor rather than an individual one. Reikin, the non-refundable key money most renters in Japan associate with a bygone era, is still routine here. And the actual monthly cost of living in one of these buildings is rarely the number printed on the listing.
Where the stock sits Minato Ward (Azabu, Aoyama, Akasaka, Roppongi), plus pockets in Shibuya, Chuo and Shinjuku Entry-level luxury rent ~¥250,000–¥450,000/month Prime tower rent ~¥800,000–¥2,000,000/month Ultra-luxury / branded residence ¥2,000,000–¥4,800,000+/month Typical guarantor cost 50–100% of one month's rent, plus an annual renewal fee Best for Relocating executives, high-income professionals, anyone who wants the paperwork handled Not ideal for Budget renters, anyone who wants a quiet, low-key building, first-time Tokyo residents on a standard local salary
Yes, if what you're actually buying is convenience and certainty, not just square footage.
The premium over a standard Tokyo rental doesn't mainly buy you a bigger apartment. It buys a bilingual concierge who can deal with a delivery company on your behalf, a guarantor and screening process built around foreign tenants and corporate leases, security that makes a difference if you're a public-facing executive, and a building where the paperwork moves fast because the landlord has done this a hundred times before. If none of that matters to you, you can get a perfectly comfortable apartment in the same neighborhoods for a third of the price.
Whether it's worth it for you specifically comes down to one question more than any other: who's paying, and why. An employer covering the cost as part of a relocation package changes the calculation entirely, because the premium is effectively free to you and the convenience is pure upside. Paying for it yourself out of a strong but ordinary salary is a different decision, and for most people in that position, the honest answer is that the money buys less than it appears to.
There's no official cutoff. Nobody at the ward office issues a certificate. Agents just know it when they see it.
In practice, agents who specialize in this segment draw the line somewhere around ¥250,000 to ¥300,000 a month for an entry-level "high-grade" listing, rising with no real ceiling. At the top end, Tokyo's most expensive tracked rental, a penthouse-scale unit at Roppongi Hills Residence, has changed hands for as much as ¥4.81 million a month, according to a decade-long rental history compiled by Diamond Real Estate Institute, the research arm of the Diamond business-media group. That same analysis found more than 110 buildings in Minato Ward alone with a monthly rent history above ¥1 million, against just 20 in Chiyoda and Chuo wards combined, 51 in Shibuya, and 8 in Shinjuku.
That concentration is the first thing to understand about this market. "Luxury" in Tokyo isn't evenly distributed. It's a Minato Ward phenomenon with a few satellite pockets elsewhere, and the gap between Minato and everywhere else is not close.
Three rough tiers are useful when you're comparing listings:
A few real listings help put those bands in context, drawn from Japanese rental market data. Units at Park Court Akasaka Hinokicho The Tower, a 44-story building next to Tokyo Midtown, have listed between roughly ¥1.15 million and ¥2.3 million a month for 2LDK to 3SLDK layouts of around 100 to 128 square meters. The Park Residences at the Ritz-Carlton Tokyo, which gives residents access to the hotel's services, has listed in a similar ¥1.05 million to ¥2.35 million range. At the newer, larger end, Mita Garden Hills, a six-building, 1,002-unit complex jointly developed by Mitsui Fudosan Residential and Mitsubishi Estate Residence a short walk from Azabu-Juban Station, has listed units from roughly ¥380,000 up to ¥1.5 million depending on the building and layout, with 1R through 4LDK available across the complex.
None of this is regulated or standardized. There's no rating body. Two buildings at the same rent can differ enormously in what's actually included, which is why the next few sections matter more than the headline number.
Ask a Tokyo luxury-rental agent where their inventory is and you'll hear the same shorthand: 3A+R, for Azabu, Aoyama, Akasaka and Roppongi. All four sit inside Minato Ward, within a few minutes of each other, and together they account for the overwhelming majority of the city's high-end rental stock.
There are reasons this cluster formed and stayed put rather than spreading. It's inside the Yamanote loop but genuinely quiet at night once you're off the main roads, which is a rarer combination in central Tokyo than it sounds. It has the highest concentration of embassies in the country, which anchors decades of diplomatic and executive demand. And developers know the address itself carries weight. So newer luxury stock keeps getting built inside the same few neighborhoods rather than spreading out to cheaper land elsewhere.
Outside 3A+R, three other pockets matter:
The bay towers are worth a closer look if budget matters more to you than address prestige. Much of that stock, including large waterfront developments in Harumi and Kachidoki, sits on reclaimed land that simply didn't exist as buildable ground a few decades ago, which means the supply is newer and the floor plates are bigger than almost anything available in the older, land-constrained streets of Minato. You give up the embassy-district cachet and, in some buildings, a slightly longer commute into the central business districts. What you gain is genuinely more space for the money, which matters more than it sounds if you're renting for a family rather than a single executive.
Nishi-Shinjuku's cluster, anchored by towers like The Parkhouse Nishi-Shinjuku Tower 60, one of the tallest residential buildings in the city, trades the quiet of a low-rise diplomatic neighborhood for direct proximity to one of Tokyo's largest transit and business hubs. It suits a different kind of renter: someone who wants the tower lifestyle and the skyline view but doesn't need the Minato address specifically.
If you want a closer look at what one specific ultra-luxury developer's product actually includes, our piece on La Tour by Sumitomo breaks down the amenities, screening and pricing across all 30 of its Tokyo buildings.
The location decision here is less about which neighborhood is "best" and more about which trade-off you're making: 3A+R for embassy-district prestige and walkability, the bay towers for more space per yen, Daikanyama for a quieter, less corporate feel.
The table below reflects current listing ranges compiled from Japanese rental market data for the three tiers described above. Treat these as current market bands rather than fixed prices; individual buildings and floors vary widely, and this segment doesn't publish an official index the way the general rental market does.
| Tier | Typical Layout | Monthly Rent | What You Get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry-level luxury | 1LDK–2LDK | ¥250,000–¥450,000 | Concierge desk, small gym, better finishes than standard stock |
| Prime tower | 2LDK–3LDK | ¥800,000–¥2,000,000 | Full concierge, fitness center, sky lounge, serious security |
| Ultra-luxury / branded | 3LDK and larger | ¥2,000,000–¥4,800,000+ | Hotel-grade service, largest floor plates, top-tier addresses |
Rent bands compiled from Japanese rental market data as of September 2026, current market averages rather than fixed ceilings; individual units vary by floor, view and building age.
The market itself is not standing still. Tokyo posted 9.6% annual growth in prime rents in Q3 2025, according to Knight Frank's Prime Global Rental Index, the fastest rate of the 16 cities the index tracks after New York and Zurich. The same report attributes the increase to a genuine supply shortage in the top tier rather than a broad-based rental spike, meaning the pressure is concentrated in exactly the buildings and neighborhoods this guide covers.
One pattern worth knowing before you start touring buildings: age cuts the other way here compared to most Tokyo housing. A newer building in a comparable location will usually command a higher rent than an older one with a famous name, even when the older building is more recognizable. Roppongi Hills Residence, completed in 2003, now ranks ninth by rent-per-tsubo among Minato's top luxury buildings; a 2018-built tower a few blocks away tops that same ranking. If you're chasing brand recognition over actual value, you'll pay for it twice.
At the entry-luxury tier, the difference from a standard apartment is mostly cosmetic: better fixtures, a concierge who receives packages, maybe a shared gym. It's real, but it's small.
Above that, the differences get more concrete. A staffed concierge who can act on your behalf changes daily life in ways that matter more here than they would in a country where you speak the language and know the systems. Booking a moving company, dealing with a delivery driver who can't find the entrance, or handling a maintenance request in Japanese: all of it becomes someone else's job rather than yours.
Security is the other real difference. It's not cosmetic either. Multi-layer access control, where a visitor has to clear the concierge before an elevator will even take them to your floor, means something different for a public-facing executive than it does for most renters. So does a building where the front desk can decline an unwanted visitor on your behalf without involving you directly.
In-unit fittings are the other place the premium shows up, and it's worth checking for specifically rather than assuming a building has it. Standard Japanese apartments rarely come with a dishwasher, a garbage disposal, or underfloor heating; buildings at the prime and ultra-luxury tiers frequently do, along with higher ceilings than the Tokyo norm and layouts closer to what a Western renter would expect from an equivalent budget back home. None of that is guaranteed at every address that markets itself as luxury, so ask for the specific in-unit spec sheet rather than assuming the building's general reputation covers your unit.
Pet policies are worth checking building by building rather than assuming. Some prime towers are genuinely pet-friendly; others allow it on paper through the building's management rules but leave the final call to the individual unit's owner, since these are almost always owned by individual investors and rented out through a management company rather than owned outright by a single landlord entity. Ask before you fall in love with a floor plan.
If you want the fuller picture of what Tokyo's high end looks like from the buyer's side rather than the renter's, our guide to Tokyo's ultra-luxury real estate market covers the sales market these same buildings sit inside.
We're not going to re-run a building-by-building rundown here; we've already done that properly. If you want specific names, floor counts and standout features, our rundown of Tokyo's top luxury apartment buildings covers ten of them in detail, from Roppongi Hills Residence to Azabudai Hills Residence.
What's worth adding here, because it's the renter's-side question that piece doesn't answer, is how much building reputation should actually weigh in your decision. Less than you'd think. A name is not a guarantee. A famous name gets you a good story at a dinner party; it doesn't guarantee the unit itself is well-maintained, well-managed, or a good fit for how you actually live. Two buildings from the same developer, built five years apart, can differ more in the quality of daily management than either differs from a completely unrelated competitor.
The thing that actually varies building to building, more than the architecture or the brand name, is the quality of the management company running day-to-day operations. A concierge desk that's fully staffed and genuinely responsive at 11pm on a Sunday is a different product from one that looks identical on the building's marketing page but is short-staffed in practice. This is exactly the kind of detail a listing photo can't show you and a viewing alone won't reveal either; it's worth asking a broker who has placed other tenants in the same building what their actual experience has been, rather than relying on the building's own reputation.
The headline rent is never the whole number. Tokyo's move-in cost structure applies at every price point, and at the luxury end the absolute yen amounts get large even though the underlying percentages are familiar to anyone who has rented in Japan before.
Expect to budget for these on top of the first month's rent:
Worked example. On a ¥1,000,000/month prime-tower unit with a 2-month shikikin, 1-month reikin, 1-month agency fee and a guarantor fee at 80% of one month's rent, you're looking at roughly ¥4,800,000 in cash before you've paid a single month of actual rent. That's not a typo. It's the number that catches people who've budgeted only for the monthly figure.
At the entry-level tier the same arithmetic is gentler but still adds up. On a ¥300,000/month unit with the same 2-month shikikin, 1-month reikin, 1-month agency fee and an 80% guarantor fee, expect roughly ¥1,440,000 in cash before your first month of rent. Scale the math to whatever rent you're actually looking at rather than assuming either example applies directly to your building.
Company leases change this math. A meaningful share of tenants at this level sign through their employer rather than as individuals, known as a corporate or shataku-style lease. Screening is generally faster because the company's creditworthiness stands in for the individual's, initial costs are often absorbed or reimbursed by the employer, and some buildings will waive or reduce the deposit for an established corporate tenant. If your relocation package includes housing, ask your HR contact early whether they're set up to lease directly. It changes which buildings will even talk to you.
If you're financing the move yourself rather than through an employer, our breakdown of essential fees to budget for when renting in Japan walks through the standard-market version of this same cost stack.
The core process at this tier isn't fundamentally different for a foreign tenant than for a Japanese one, but two things shift.
Screening leans harder on income, and the bar is higher than the standard market. Japanese rental-industry guidance commonly cites an annual income of roughly 36 times the monthly rent as the general screening threshold across the market, rising to around 40 times for higher-grade buildings like the ones this guide covers. On a ¥1,000,000-a-month unit, that works out to a documented annual income in the ¥36 million to ¥40 million range, whether that's your own salary, a household income, or your employer's backing on a corporate lease. Treat the multiple itself as an illustrative rule of thumb rather than a fixed rule; individual buildings and guarantor companies set their own bar, and it isn't published anywhere as an official standard.
Visa status matters less here than the paperwork suggests. There's no legal requirement tying eligibility for a luxury rental to a specific visa category. What actually decides it is whether you can show stable, verifiable income and pass a guarantor company's screening, whether that's your own salary, a spouse's, or your employer's backing on a corporate lease. Some buildings and agencies serving this segment have been doing so for decades and have well-established processes for exactly this situation; that's a large part of what the premium is paying for.
At the same time, don't assume every English-language relocation resource is describing universal policy. Some guides aimed at expats claim certain premium buildings waive the guarantor requirement entirely for sufficiently high-income tenants. We couldn't independently verify that as a general practice rather than a case-by-case exception, so treat it as something to ask your agent about directly rather than something to plan around.
Whether or not a guarantor requirement is waived, understanding what these companies actually check and charge is worth doing before you start touring buildings. Our guide to why guarantor companies exist in Japan covers the mechanics in full.
At E-Housing, we work with foreigners, expat families, international students and working professionals across greater Tokyo every day, and the luxury segment is one where a bilingual agent earns their fee: these buildings move fast, paperwork is dense, and a broker who already has a relationship with the management company can get you into a viewing before a listing even goes public.
Rent is not the only recurring cost, and at this tier the gap between "rent" and "actual monthly outlay" is bigger than most first-time luxury renters expect.
Management fees (kanrihi) and repair reserve contributions (shuzen tsumitatekin) are typically bundled into what a landlord quotes as the all-in monthly cost on a rental listing, but it's worth knowing they exist as separate line items, because they scale with the building's amenities rather than with your unit's size alone. Nationally, average management fees run around ¥15,956 a month and repair reserves around ¥12,268, according to real estate industry data; buildings with a concierge, pool, gym and 24-hour staffing run well above that national baseline, and towers over 20 stories carry structurally higher repair costs because exterior maintenance requires suspended scaffolding rather than a standard scaffold, a real difference in how the work gets done and what it costs.
Renewal fees (koshinryo) are also standard at this tier, typically one month's rent every two years, the same convention as the broader Tokyo rental market. It's not a luxury-specific cost, but it's worth remembering it's coming.
The scaffolding difference is a good example of why luxury-tower maintenance costs run structurally higher rather than just proportionally higher. Buildings above roughly 16 stories generally can't use a standard ground-up scaffold for exterior repair work; the work has to be done from a suspended gondola lowered from the roof instead, which costs more and takes longer per square meter of facade than conventional scaffolding. Every luxury tower's long-term repair reserve carries that cost, regardless of how famous the building's name is. It's one of the quiet reasons a tower's all-in monthly cost creeps upward over the building's life even when the rent itself hasn't moved.
None of this is disclosed as clearly as the headline rent, and it's not always broken out in the listing you're shown first. Ask for the full monthly cost, not just the rent line, before you commit to a viewing schedule.
Most buildings in this guide are high-rises, and high-rise living in Tokyo comes with a well-documented set of trade-offs that apply regardless of how much you're paying in rent: elevator dependence during peak hours or power outages, stronger perceived sway during earthquakes even in structurally sound buildings, and a scale of building (500-plus units in some towers) that can make it harder to build a sense of community than in a smaller property.
We've covered this ground in detail already, including the disaster-preparedness engineering that makes Tokyo's high-rises among the safest in the world despite the sway you'll feel on a high floor. Rather than repeat it here, see our full breakdown of the pros and cons of high-rise living in Tokyo.
What's worth adding for this specific market: paying more doesn't buy you out of these trade-offs. A ¥2 million-a-month unit on the 40th floor of a luxury tower has the same elevator dependency and the same sway as a ¥150,000 unit on the 40th floor of a standard building next door. The premium buys service and address, not immunity from the physics of being on a high floor.
There's a real gap between how this market gets described in Japanese and how it gets described in English, and it's worth knowing about before you tour your first building.
Japanese discussion of tower living, on note.com, Yahoo!知恵袋 and mansion-review communities, is skeptical almost regardless of price point. The recurring complaints are specific: management fees and repair reserves that climb steadily as a building ages, elevator waits during morning rush hour in a 500-unit tower, noticeable sway on high floors during even moderate earthquakes, and a scale of building that makes it genuinely harder to know your neighbors than in a smaller property. None of that skepticism disappears just because the building is expensive. Money doesn't fix physics. If anything, residents in the Japanese-language conversation treat the premium tiers as buying better finishes and better service, not as buying out of the structural trade-offs of living in a tower at all.
English-language coverage aimed at foreign renters tells a noticeably more one-sided story. Relocation guides and expat-facing sites describe these same buildings almost entirely in terms of the concierge, the security and the convenience, with little to no mention of the maintenance-fee creep or the community-scale trade-offs that dominate the Japanese conversation about the exact same towers. That's not necessarily wrong, since convenience and security are genuinely what a foreign tenant is usually paying for, but it's an incomplete picture if you're deciding whether the building itself, rather than just the service layer around it, is going to suit how you actually want to live.
The honest synthesis: the service and security premium is real and well worth it for the right renter, and it's separate from the tower-living trade-offs, which apply here exactly as they do to any high-rise in the city, expensive or not.
Pros:
Cons:
This tier makes sense if your employer is covering some or all of the housing cost, if you specifically need the security and privacy a public-facing role requires, or if the time saved by having someone else handle logistics is worth more to you than the yen difference.
It doesn't make sense if you're paying out of pocket on a standard local salary and comparing it to a normal Tokyo apartment purely on space or view. You'll get more livable square meters per yen, without the reikin and the inflated management fee, one or two neighborhoods over. It also doesn't make sense if what you actually want is a quiet, low-key building with minimal turnover and no shared amenities to maintain; several of the towers in this segment run 500 or more units, and that scale is the opposite of quiet.
If you're weighing this decision purely as an investment rather than a place to live, that's a different calculation entirely, and our piece on Tokyo's ultra-luxury real estate market, linked above, is the better starting point.
| Option | Typical Monthly Cost | Screening | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard tower unit | ¥150,000–¥400,000 | Standard guarantor process, income roughly 36x rent | Value-focused renters who still want a tower address |
| Entry-level luxury | ¥250,000–¥450,000 | Slightly stricter, 36–40x rent | Renters who want a concierge without the full premium tier |
| Prime or ultra-luxury tower | ¥800,000–¥4,800,000+ | Corporate lease common, ~40x rent for individuals | Executives, high-income professionals, corporate relocations |
| Serviced apartment | ¥250,000–¥600,000+, often all-inclusive | Minimal, often no guarantor required | Short stays, immediate move-in, no long-term commitment |
A serviced apartment is the closest substitute if what you actually want is the convenience without the lease commitment: no guarantor, immediate move-in, and utilities usually bundled into the quoted price. What you give up is space and, in most cases, the address prestige of the top-tier towers. It's a genuinely different product solving a different problem, not a cheaper version of the same thing.
If you're relocating for work, ask your employer's HR team before you start touring buildings whether they lease directly or reimburse you as an individual tenant. That single answer determines which buildings and agents will move fastest for you, and it can change your total move-in cost by millions of yen.
If you're renting as an individual without corporate backing, get your income documentation in order before you view anything you're serious about. Guarantor screening at this tier moves quickly once a building manager is interested, and being the applicant who's ready to submit documents same-day is a real advantage in a market with limited supply.
And don't let the building's name do the deciding for you. Ask to see the actual unit, ask what the all-in monthly cost looks like including management fees, and ask directly whether reikin is negotiable; on units that have been vacant for a while, it sometimes is.
On timing: this segment moves faster than the standard rental market once a decision-maker is actually interested, particularly when a corporate guarantor is already in place. Where a standard-market application and screening cycle can take a week or more, a well-prepared applicant at this tier, documents ready, guarantor company or employer confirmed, can sometimes move from viewing to signed lease in a matter of days. The bottleneck is almost never the building. It's whichever piece of paperwork on your side is still outstanding when a unit you want comes up.
At E-Housing, we work with foreigners, expat families, international students and working professionals across greater Tokyo every day, including the relocating executives and high-income professionals this segment is built for. We know which buildings in the 3A+R cluster actually deliver on the concierge-and-security promise and which are coasting on an address, and we can walk you through a corporate lease if your employer isn't set up for one. If you're weighing whether this tier is worth it for your situation, get in touch and we'll give you a straight answer, not a sales pitch.
For the right renter, yes, and not because of the marble lobby. It's worth it when someone else, an employer or your own income, can absorb the real cost stack: the rent, the reikin, the guarantor fee, the management fee that isn't in the headline number. What you get in return is a level of service and certainty that genuinely helps if you're new to Japan, don't speak fluent Japanese, or need the security a public role requires.
It's not worth it as a default choice for anyone comparing it purely on space, view or bragging rights against a normal Tokyo apartment two neighborhoods over. That apartment exists, it's cheaper, and for most renters, it's the better decision.
The clearest sign you're in the right segment isn't the rent you're willing to pay. It's whether you can name, specifically, what the premium is buying you: a concierge you'll actually use, a security posture your role genuinely requires, or a guarantor process your employer has already smoothed over. If you can't answer that question specifically, the rent is probably buying an address rather than anything you'll notice day to day.
There's no official threshold, but agents in this segment generally start using the term around ¥250,000 to ¥300,000 a month for an entry-level listing, with no real ceiling above that.
Entry-level luxury runs roughly ¥250,000 to ¥450,000 a month, prime towers roughly ¥800,000 to ¥2,000,000, and the very top of the market has reached as high as ¥4.81 million a month for the largest tracked units.
The large majority sit in Minato Ward, concentrated in Azabu, Aoyama, Akasaka and Roppongi, an area agents in the segment shorthand as "3A+R." Smaller clusters exist in Daikanyama, Ebisu, the Chuo Ward bay towers, and Nishi-Shinjuku.
Yes. Reikin, a non-refundable payment to the landlord, is still customary at most buildings in this segment, typically 1 to 2 months' rent, though it's sometimes negotiable on units that have been vacant for a while.
Yes, and it's a market segment where many buildings and agencies have decades of experience specifically serving foreign and corporate tenants. There's no visa restriction on renting at this tier; approval comes down to income verification and guarantor screening.
Japanese rental-industry guidance commonly cites roughly 36 times the monthly rent in annual income as a general screening benchmark, rising to around 40 times for higher-grade buildings. This isn't a published legal standard, and individual guarantor companies set their own criteria.
In almost all cases, yes. Guarantor company fees at this tier typically run 50 to 100% of one month's rent upfront, plus an annual renewal fee. A corporate lease, where your employer is the tenant of record, can sometimes simplify or bypass this requirement.
It varies by building and sometimes by individual unit, since most are owned by individual investors rather than the management company itself. Confirm pet policy directly rather than assuming a building's general reputation for being pet-friendly applies to the specific unit you're viewing.
A luxury apartment is a standard lease with a high-end building and full-time staff; a serviced apartment is a shorter-term, fully furnished product that usually skips the guarantor requirement and bundles utilities, at the cost of less space and less prestige of address.
They scale with the building's amenities. National averages sit around ¥15,956 a month for management fees and ¥12,268 for repair reserves, but amenity-heavy luxury towers with concierge, pool and gym staffing run well above those baselines.
It's shorthand used by luxury-rental agents for Azabu, Aoyama, Akasaka and Roppongi, four adjoining neighborhoods in Minato Ward that together hold the large majority of Tokyo's high-end rental stock.
That depends on your time horizon and whether you're looking at this as a home or an investment. Our guide to Tokyo's ultra-luxury real estate market, linked earlier in this article, covers the buy-side case in detail.
Modern high-rises in Tokyo, including the buildings covered in this guide, are built to strict seismic engineering standards and are generally considered very safe structurally, though residents on higher floors do feel more sway during an earthquake than those lower down. Our guide to high-rise living in Tokyo, linked earlier in this article, covers the engineering and the trade-offs in full.
It's a lease where a company, rather than an individual, is the named tenant, common among relocating executives. Screening typically moves faster because the company's credit stands in for the individual's, and some employers absorb or reimburse the initial move-in costs directly.
Yes. Tokyo's prime rental market grew 9.6% year-on-year in the third quarter of 2025, one of the fastest rates among the major global cities tracked by Knight Frank's Prime Global Rental Index, driven by genuine supply scarcity in the top tier rather than a broad market-wide increase.
E-Housing connects you with quality properties across Tokyo. Whether you’re renting, buying or selling, our experts are ready to help. Fill out the form below for a response within 24 hours.